<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Valveamplifiers on The Singemonkey</title>
    <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/valveamplifiers/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Valveamplifiers on The Singemonkey</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/valveamplifiers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>September 30, 2020</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2020-09-30-since-im-going-to-be/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2020-09-30-since-im-going-to-be/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Since I&amp;rsquo;m going to be home alone with no one to annoy, this seems like a good chance to record my real amp. They&amp;rsquo;ve gone an amazing way towards perfectly simulating vacuum tube amplifiers now. But they still suffer from the problem where you have to dial in the settings for a particular thing say, lead on the bridge pickup, that then won&amp;rsquo;t sound great playing rhythm on the neck pickup with the volume rolled back on the guitar. The original 1940s tech does not suffer from this problem. A good, 1960s style tube-amp with a great loudspeaker, and a good guitar with great pickups, and you need to work pretty hard to make it sound less than great. I want to record an old Otis Redding number that really needs me to be able to switch between stuff on the guitar.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
