<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Portraitrequest on The Singemonkey</title>
    <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/portraitrequest/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Portraitrequest on The Singemonkey</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/portraitrequest/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>October 28, 2021</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2021-10-28-this-guy-asked-me-to/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2021-10-28-this-guy-asked-me-to/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This guy asked me to take his pic when he saw me with my camera this morning near the Observatory station. He&amp;rsquo;s a local and I used to know his name, but was all thinking about camera stuff and forgot to ask. So there&amp;rsquo;s a weird thing with digital cameras: people are usually satisfied just to see themselves on the back of the camera. Now I&amp;rsquo;ve got a bit of a scheme. I want to get one of those Instax printers so I can make a print on the spot from the camera. Unfortunately it won&amp;rsquo;t be this one. The XE1 came out in 2013 and doesn&amp;rsquo;t have any wireless connectivity. But it&amp;rsquo;s something I plan to put together in the future because so many people don&amp;rsquo;t have any pictures of themselves - for memories or to pass on to loved ones. Pics on phones often end up disappearing with those phones. And few people ever have their picture taken by anyone who&amp;rsquo;s learned much photographic technique. So I&amp;rsquo;d really like to be able to make a small but high quality print when I take a picture of a someone I&amp;rsquo;m not in digital contact with. The instax printer uses a photographic printing technique so the quality is a lot better than that of other portable printers - but the prints are about $1 each. So I&amp;rsquo;d still have to be sparing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
