<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Lens on The Singemonkey</title>
    <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/lens/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Lens on The Singemonkey</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/lens/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>September 28, 2017</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-09-28-the-lens-that-i-was/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-09-28-the-lens-that-i-was/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The lens that I was using yesterday was really the lens that Nikon’s reputation was built on. This 105mm f2.5 from the 1960s was sharp, contrasty, and cheap compared to anything put out by Leica. It’s still a beautiful portrait lens that flattens perspective and delivers a delicious, powdery soft background. It’s light as a feather and even cheaper now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#nikon #nikkor #lens #lenses #105mm #f2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
