<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Hondo on The Singemonkey</title>
    <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/hondo/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hondo on The Singemonkey</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/hondo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>December 11, 2023</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2023-12-11-this-is-a-lost-photo/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2023-12-11-this-is-a-lost-photo/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a lost photo. The only version I had was one on Flickr with a long edge of 768 pixels. I’m trying AI up scaling and the results are better on images that are sharper and less underexposed than this was. It’s my dear friends &lt;a href=&#34;https://instagram.com/sadshirtshop&#34;&gt;@sadshirtshop&lt;/a&gt; when they were in a band called Fezray (Fez and beret, right?).
Anyway, I liked this pic and the AI has definitely improved over the mess-of-visible-pixels alternatives from years past.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
