<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Engineering on The Singemonkey</title>
    <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/engineering/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Engineering on The Singemonkey</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/tags/engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>December 28, 2017</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-12-28-you-may-find-a-hint/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-12-28-you-may-find-a-hint/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You may find a hint that these little binoculars are getting on in years. But they’re still absolutely brilliant - literally.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>September 28, 2017</title>
      <link>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-09-28-the-lens-that-i-was/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://photoblog-a3l.pages.dev/posts/2017-09-28-the-lens-that-i-was/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The lens that I was using yesterday was really the lens that Nikon’s reputation was built on. This 105mm f2.5 from the 1960s was sharp, contrasty, and cheap compared to anything put out by Leica. It’s still a beautiful portrait lens that flattens perspective and delivers a delicious, powdery soft background. It’s light as a feather and even cheaper now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#nikon #nikkor #lens #lenses #105mm #f2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
